Second Amendment still in affect

As you all know the Supreme Court ruled to strike down the D.C. ordinance banning the possession of handguns. This is one great day for Americans because the Constitution gives us this right to have and bear arms. But some disagree with this.

In Chicago, Ill. Jennifer Hoyle said. “In the sense the Supreme Court has found this is an individual right to bear arms, we recognize the ruling is significant threat. It gives people an opening to challenged the ordinance in a way it hasn’t been challenged in may years.” What “threat” does the Constitution offer Ms. Hoyle?

You have got your ban of guns in Chicago but let you can not explain why 27 students were killed by gun fire since September. All you have done is taken guns out of the hands of the lawful citizens. “I’m still trying to figure out who we are more in love with, our children or our guns." No we are more in love with the rights of law bidding citizens.
In San Francisco, Ca. Mayor Newsom said the ruling “just flies in the face or reality. “You just wish the Supreme court could spend a week in public housing and then come out with this decision.”

Mayor Newsom, are you trying to tell us that the people who lives in public housing shops at the local gun store? Do they do all the necessary paper work and get permits for them? Or do they buy, sell and trade among their selves with no regard to law? Put all the gun bans you want and the only thing you will do is take guns away from people who wants protection. The criminal will laugh at you.